METY.L vs. MAGD.L
METY.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP) and MAGD.L (IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MAGD.L.
Performance
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METY.L achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than MAGD.L's -16.98% return.
METY.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 6M
- -16.59%
- 1Y
- -23.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGD.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -16.98%
- 6M
- -16.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | -18.12% | -10.34% |
MAGD.L IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP | -16.98% | 10.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between METY.L and MAGD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METY.L vs. MAGD.L — Risk / Return Rank
METY.L
MAGD.L
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METY.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METY.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | -0.41 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METY.L drawdown since its inception was -39.94%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METY.L and MAGD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METY.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -27.28% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.46% | -23.55% | -8.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -10.72% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.02% | — | — |
Volatility
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METY.L | MAGD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.19% | 20.62% | +8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 20.62% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 20.62% | +9.77% |
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison
METY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, more than MAGD.L's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGD.L IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP | 0.39% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | 18.81% | 19.94% | 3.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METY.L and MAGD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METY.L.
Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METY.L and 0.45% for MAGD.L.
Find the right allocation for METY.L and MAGD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer