PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METY.L vs. MAGD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METY.L achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than MAGD.L's -16.98% return.


METY.L

1D
3.19%
1M
6.11%
YTD
-18.12%
6M
-16.59%
1Y
-23.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGD.L

1D
0.97%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-16.98%
6M
-16.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
METY.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP
-18.12%-10.34%
MAGD.L
IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP
-16.98%10.94%

Correlation

The correlation between METY.L and MAGD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METY.L vs. MAGD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METY.L
METY.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
METY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
METY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
METY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METY.LMAGD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METY.LMAGD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

-0.41

+0.23

Drawdowns

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METY.L drawdown since its inception was -39.94%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METY.L and MAGD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METY.LMAGD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.94%

-27.28%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.46%

-23.55%

-8.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.37%

-10.72%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.02%

Volatility

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METY.LMAGD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.19%

20.62%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.39%

20.62%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.39%

20.62%

+9.77%

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

METY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

METY.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison

METY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, more than MAGD.L's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAGD.L
IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP
0.39%0.07%0.00%
METY.L
IncomeShares META Options ETP
18.81%19.94%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


METY.L and MAGD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METY.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METY.L and 0.45% for MAGD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METY.L and MAGD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer