METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO
METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and YGOG.NEO (Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METE.TO returned -5.95% vs 119.67% for YGOG.NEO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than YGOG.NEO's 10.76% return.
METE.TO
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YGOG.NEO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 119.67%
- 3Y*
- 45.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -4.55% | -0.67% |
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 10.76% | 65.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between METE.TO and YGOG.NEO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
METE.TO
YGOG.NEO
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METE.TO | YGOG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | 3.77 | -3.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | 4.77 | -4.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.61 | -0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 5.52 | -5.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 20.61 | -20.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METE.TO | YGOG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 3.77 | -3.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 1.62 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, which is greater than YGOG.NEO's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and YGOG.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METE.TO | YGOG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -33.45% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.48% | -21.82% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.07% | -11.86% | -10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -7.59% | -8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 5.83% | +10.68% |
Volatility
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) is 9.99%, while Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that METE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YGOG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METE.TO | YGOG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 11.10% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.26% | 22.75% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.57% | 32.02% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 32.94% | +9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 32.94% | +9.14% |
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METE.TO and YGOG.NEO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
METE.TO vs. YGOG.NEO - Dividend Comparison
METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, more than YGOG.NEO's 8.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 25.77% | 21.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 8.15% | 5.84% | 14.19% | 7.22% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METE.TO and YGOG.NEO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METE.TO and YGOG.NEO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Purpose.
Find the right allocation for METE.TO and YGOG.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer