METE.TO vs. USCL.TO
METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and USCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METE.TO returned -5.95% vs 29.89% for USCL.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for USCL.TO.
Performance
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than USCL.TO's 11.57% return.
METE.TO
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 29.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -4.55% | -0.67% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.57% | 8.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between METE.TO and USCL.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between METE.TO and USCL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
METE.TO
USCL.TO
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | 2.55 | -2.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | 3.43 | -3.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.49 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 3.51 | -3.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 14.29 | -14.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 2.55 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 1.42 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, which is greater than USCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and USCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -21.85% | -18.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.48% | -8.56% | -26.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.07% | -0.08% | -21.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -2.55% | -13.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 2.10% | +14.41% |
Volatility
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) at 2.86%. This indicates that METE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 2.86% | +7.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.26% | 9.31% | +18.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.57% | 11.79% | +24.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 15.44% | +26.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 15.44% | +26.64% |
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
METE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
METE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, more than USCL.TO's 11.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 25.77% | 21.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.95% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METE.TO and USCL.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USCL.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for METE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for METE.TO and 0.04% for USCL.TO.
Find the right allocation for METE.TO and USCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer