METE.TO vs. UNHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and UNHG (Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group, while UNHG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UNHG.

Performance

METE.TO vs. UNHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

METE.TO is traded in CAD, while UNHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UNHG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than UNHG's 14.48% return.

METE.TO

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -2.86%
• 1Y: -5.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNHG

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METE.TO vs. UNHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	-4.55%	-6.40%
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	14.48%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between METE.TO and UNHG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

METE.TO vs. UNHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METE.TO

METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METE.TO vs. UNHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METE.TO	UNHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METE.TO	UNHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.59	-0.68

Drawdowns

METE.TO vs. UNHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, smaller than the maximum UNHG drawdown of -57.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and UNHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	METE.TO	UNHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.10%	-57.19%	+17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.07%	-13.14%	-8.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.68%	-23.14%	+7.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METE.TO	UNHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.57%	82.39%	-45.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.08%	82.39%	-40.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.08%	82.39%	-40.31%

METE.TO vs. UNHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

METE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

METE.TO vs. UNHG - Dividend Comparison

METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, more than UNHG's 10.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	25.77%	21.31%
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	10.00%	11.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METE.TO and UNHG in my portfolio?

METE.TO and UNHG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METE.TO or UNHG?

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METE.TO or UNHG?

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UNHG.

What is the main difference between METE.TO and UNHG?

METE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while UNHG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for METE.TO and 0.75% for UNHG.