METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and BKCC.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METE.TO returned -5.95% vs 41.73% for BKCC.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for BKCC.TO.

Performance

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METE.TO achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than BKCC.TO's 14.24% return.

METE.TO

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -2.86%
• 1Y: -5.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKCC.TO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 41.73%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	-4.55%	-0.67%
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF	14.24%	27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between METE.TO and BKCC.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METE.TO

METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BKCC.TO

BKCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BKCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BKCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METE.TO	BKCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	4.06	-4.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	5.85	-5.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.80	-0.80
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	5.75	-5.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	26.70	-27.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the BKCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METE.TO and BKCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METE.TO	BKCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	4.06	-4.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.00	-0.09

Drawdowns

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.10%, roughly equal to the maximum BKCC.TO drawdown of -41.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METE.TO and BKCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	METE.TO	BKCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.10%	-41.18%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.48%	-7.30%	-28.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.07%	-1.42%	-20.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.68%	-5.91%	-9.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.51%	1.57%	+14.94%

Volatility

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) at 3.59%. This indicates that METE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METE.TO	BKCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	3.59%	+6.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.26%	9.18%	+19.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.57%	10.31%	+26.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.08%	12.99%	+29.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.08%	16.99%	+25.09%

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCC.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

METE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

METE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.77%, more than BKCC.TO's 9.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF	9.52%	10.43%	12.30%	10.93%	8.23%	5.52%	5.92%	5.44%	6.24%	5.76%	5.79%	7.35%
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	25.77%	21.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METE.TO and BKCC.TO in my portfolio?

METE.TO and BKCC.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METE.TO or BKCC.TO?

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METE.TO or BKCC.TO?

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for BKCC.TO.

What is the main difference between METE.TO and BKCC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for METE.TO and 0.84% for BKCC.TO.