PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
META vs. STRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

META vs. STRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


META

1D
4.77%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
-9.93%
6M
-8.18%
1Y
-12.74%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
18.14%

STRD

1D
-4.57%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. STRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between META and STRD is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

META:

$1.52T

STRD:

$22.78B

EPS

META:

$27.47

STRD:

-$38.95

PS Ratio

META:

7.10

STRD:

43.47

PB Ratio

META:

6.24

STRD:

0.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

META:

$214.96B

STRD:

$490.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

META:

$176.14B

STRD:

$334.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

META:

$106.31B

STRD:

$520.73M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

META vs. STRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

STRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. STRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METASTRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

META vs. STRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

META vs. STRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than STRD's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and STRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METASTRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-7.26%

-69.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.63%

-6.53%

-18.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.83%

-4.51%

-11.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.13%

Volatility

META vs. STRD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METASTRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.89%

37.84%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.10%

37.84%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.72%

37.84%

+0.88%

Dividends

META vs. STRD - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while STRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.44%0.32%0.34%
STRD
MicroStrategy Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

META vs. STRD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and MicroStrategy Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
56.31B
124.30M
(META) Total Revenue
(STRD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


META and STRD have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for META and STRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer