META vs. NGD.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and NGD.TO (New Gold Inc.) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while NGD.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

META vs. NGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

META is traded in USD, while NGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

META

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -8.32%
• YTD: -14.03%
• 6M: -11.84%
• 1Y: -16.71%
• 3Y*: 28.18%
• 5Y*: 11.52%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

NGD.TO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. NGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-14.03%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%
NGD.TO New Gold Inc.	1.41%	249.08%	72.38%	47.88%	-33.82%	-32.47%	149.40%	14.23%	-76.55%	-5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between META and NGD.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012	0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap META : $1.45T NGD.TO : CA$9.63B
EPS META : $27.47 NGD.TO : $1.09
PE Ratio META : 20.64 NGD.TO : 7.99
PEG Ratio META : 0.85 NGD.TO : 0.01
PS Ratio META : 6.78 NGD.TO : 4.65
PB Ratio META : 5.97 NGD.TO : 3.61
Total Revenue (TTM) META : $214.96B NGD.TO : $1.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) META : $176.14B NGD.TO : $767.09M
EBITDA (TTM) META : $106.31B NGD.TO : $810.05M

Return for Risk

META vs. NGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 21
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
META Omega Ratio Rank: 20
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
META Martin Ratio Rank: 18

NGD.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. NGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	META	NGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	META	NGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.06%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.83%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	META	NGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.52%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.04%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.67%	—	—

Dividends

META vs. NGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while NGD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%
NGD.TO New Gold Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META and NGD.TO in my portfolio?

META and NGD.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.