META vs. IXC
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, META returned 19.38%/yr vs 9.18%/yr for IXC. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 19.38%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.18% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- -3.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.38%
IXC
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 35.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 21.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
META vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 3.40% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 26.83% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and IXC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.19 |
The correlation between META and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
META
IXC
META vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.31 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.32 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 7.34 | -7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -67.88% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -15.36% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -19.06% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -24.93% | -51.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -64.16% | -12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.48% | -8.72% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -17.45% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.53% | 4.85% | +12.68% |
Volatility
META vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 16.03% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 7.10%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.03% | 7.10% | +8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.01% | 15.96% | +15.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.56% | 19.36% | +19.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.57% | 23.46% | +21.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 26.82% | +12.16% |
Dividends
META vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than IXC's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.00% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and IXC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (16.03%) compared to IXC (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs IXC's -67.88%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer