META vs. HBAR-USD
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while HBAR-USD (HederaHashgraph) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, META returned 11.52%/yr vs -16.92%/yr for HBAR-USD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. HBAR-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly higher than HBAR-USD's -26.14% return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
HBAR-USD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -17.44%
- YTD
- -26.14%
- 6M
- -36.26%
- 1Y
- -50.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- -16.92%
- 10Y*
- —
META vs. HBAR-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 10.22% |
HBAR-USD HederaHashgraph | -26.14% | -60.44% | 212.23% | 135.51% | -87.44% | 812.76% | 211.49% | -97.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and HBAR-USD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. HBAR-USD — Risk / Return Rank
META
HBAR-USD
META vs. HBAR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | HBAR-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.69 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -0.98 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. HBAR-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum HBAR-USD drawdown of -97.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and HBAR-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | HBAR-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -97.58% | +20.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -73.39% | +40.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -79.29% | +45.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -92.79% | +16.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -84.50% | +56.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -74.51% | +58.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 51.80% | -35.74% |
Volatility
META vs. HBAR-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.17%, while HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) has a volatility of 16.33%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBAR-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | HBAR-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 16.33% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 43.30% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 65.06% | -29.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 85.17% | -41.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 108.57% | -69.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and HBAR-USD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBAR-USD has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs HBAR-USD's -97.58%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and HBAR-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer