META vs. CS.PA
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and CS.PA (AXA SA) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CS.PA operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for CS.PA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. CS.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
META is traded in USD, while CS.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CS.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than CS.PA's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed CS.PA with an annualized return of 17.39%, while CS.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.28% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
CS.PA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 18.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
META vs. CS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
CS.PA AXA SA | 4.12% | 42.62% | 15.89% | 24.04% | -0.21% | 32.91% | -12.08% | 38.36% | -23.27% | 23.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and CS.PA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. CS.PA — Risk / Return Rank
META
CS.PA
META vs. CS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and AXA SA (CS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.05 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.22 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 0.40 | -1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. CS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CS.PA drawdown of -79.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and CS.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -79.24% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -14.59% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -16.15% | -18.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -32.50% | -44.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -55.59% | -21.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -1.39% | -26.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -19.05% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 8.21% | +7.85% |
Volatility
META vs. CS.PA - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to AXA SA (CS.PA) at 4.98%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | CS.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 4.98% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 15.18% | +11.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 21.03% | +14.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 23.84% | +20.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 26.67% | +12.00% |
Dividends
META vs. CS.PA - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than CS.PA's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS.PA AXA SA | 5.68% | 5.25% | 5.77% | 5.76% | 5.91% | 5.46% | 3.74% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.69% | 4.59% | 3.77% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
META vs. CS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and AXA SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
META and CS.PA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for META and CS.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer