PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
META vs. AVAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

META vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -11.24% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -23.65% return. Over the past 10 years, META has underperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 17.60%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.16% annualized return.


META

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
17.60%

AVAV

1D
-0.67%
1M
9.74%
YTD
-23.65%
6M
-34.62%
1Y
-3.25%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
19.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-11.24%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-23.65%57.18%22.10%47.14%38.09%-28.62%40.75%-9.14%20.99%109.32%

Correlation

The correlation between META and AVAV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.26

The correlation between META and AVAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

META:

$1.50T

AVAV:

$9.01B

EPS

META:

$27.47

AVAV:

-$4.63

PS Ratio

META:

7.00

AVAV:

7.51

PB Ratio

META:

6.16

AVAV:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

META:

$214.96B

AVAV:

$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

META:

$176.14B

AVAV:

$104.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

META:

$106.31B

AVAV:

-$242.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

META vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METAAVAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.06

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.05

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-0.10

-0.91

META vs. AVAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the AVAV Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and AVAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METAAVAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

-0.04

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.20

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.37

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.23

+0.31

Drawdowns

META vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than AVAV's maximum drawdown of -61.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and AVAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METAAVAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-61.45%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.30%

-61.45%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.15%

-61.45%

+27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.74%

-61.45%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

-61.45%

-15.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.73%

-54.94%

+29.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.26%

-28.56%

+13.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.69%

33.68%

-17.99%

Volatility

META vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.48%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 24.99%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METAAVAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.48%

24.99%

-14.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.95%

58.60%

-31.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.56%

73.83%

-38.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.05%

55.85%

-11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.69%

51.96%

-13.27%

Dividends

META vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%

Financials

META vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
56.31B
-10.80M
(META) Total Revenue
(AVAV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


META and AVAV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAV has higher volatility (24.99%) compared to META (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs AVAV's -61.45%.

AVAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for META and AVAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer