META.L vs. FIND.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

META.L (WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced) and FIND.L (WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated) are both Metals funds from WisdomTree - META.L tracks the Optimised Roll Industrial Metals while FIND.L tracks the Bloomberg Industrial Metals 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, META.L returned 11.40%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for FIND.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. META.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FIND.L.

Performance

META.L vs. FIND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META.L achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than FIND.L's 15.30% return.

META.L

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: 30.93%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIND.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 6M: 20.95%
• 1Y: 32.15%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META.L vs. FIND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
META.L WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced	10.73%	16.98%	3.79%	-8.15%	16.29%
FIND.L WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated	15.30%	19.87%	3.63%	-11.12%	16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between META.L and FIND.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.96

The correlation between META.L and FIND.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

META.L vs. FIND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META.L

META.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
META.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
META.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
META.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
META.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
META.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FIND.L

FIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
FIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META.L vs. FIND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	META.L	FIND.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.66	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.09	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	2.54	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	6.30	+5.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

META.L vs. FIND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FIND.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META.L and FIND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	META.L	FIND.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.66	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.03	+0.53

Drawdowns

META.L vs. FIND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META.L drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, smaller than the maximum FIND.L drawdown of -65.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META.L and FIND.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	META.L	FIND.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.21%	-65.36%	+45.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-12.60%	+3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.21%	-19.06%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-13.03%	+11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-42.53%	+32.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	5.09%	-2.54%

Volatility

META.L vs. FIND.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) is 4.42%, while WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that META.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META.L	FIND.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	5.52%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.91%	13.74%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	19.31%	-4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.54%	22.58%	-5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.54%	19.71%	-2.17%

META.L vs. FIND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

META.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FIND.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

META.L vs. FIND.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither META.L nor FIND.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both META.L and FIND.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, META.L and FIND.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, META.L or FIND.L?

On fees, META.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, META.L or FIND.L?

META.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FIND.L.

What is the main difference between META.L and FIND.L?

META.L tracks Optimised Roll Industrial Metals, while FIND.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for META.L and 0.49% for FIND.L.