PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
0.51%21.31%25.87%2.16%
WSHR.NEO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF
1.81%5.34%12.31%2.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEQT.TO achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than WSHR.NEO's 1.81% return.


MEQT.TO

1D
2.74%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
0.51%
6M
4.06%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WSHR.NEO

1D
2.20%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.00%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQT.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WSHR.NEO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQT.TO
MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WSHR.NEO
WSHR.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WSHR.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEQT.TOWSHR.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

0.23

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

0.40

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.06

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

0.30

+1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.17

0.99

+8.18

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the WSHR.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQT.TO and WSHR.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEQT.TOWSHR.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

0.23

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.64

+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between MEQT.TO and WSHR.NEO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Dividend Comparison

MEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than WSHR.NEO's 1.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
1.63%1.60%1.73%0.81%0.00%0.00%
WSHR.NEO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF
1.37%1.34%1.31%1.34%2.58%0.44%

Drawdowns

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum WSHR.NEO drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQT.TO and WSHR.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MEQT.TOWSHR.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

-20.86%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-9.72%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-4.82%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-4.87%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.96%

-0.47%

Volatility

MEQT.TO vs. WSHR.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) at 4.92%. This indicates that MEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSHR.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MEQT.TOWSHR.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

4.92%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

9.01%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

14.21%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

11.18%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

11.18%

+0.72%