PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MEQT.TO having a 12.84% return and QCN.TO slightly lower at 12.70%.


MEQT.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.97%
6M
10.00%
YTD
12.84%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.44%

QCN.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.27%
6M
10.78%
YTD
12.70%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$180.94KCA$187.75KCA$184.59K
CA$1.93MCA$2.12MCA$1.86M

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
12.84%21.31%25.87%2.36%
QCN.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
12.70%31.83%21.95%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MEQT.TO and QCN.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.45

The correlation between MEQT.TO and QCN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEQT.TO
MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QCN.TO
QCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEQT.TOQCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.46

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

15.66

-2.18

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQT.TO and QCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum QCN.TO drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQT.TO and QCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEQT.TOQCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

-36.90%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-9.43%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-1.16%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-3.61%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.08%

-0.18%

Volatility

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) at 2.97%. This indicates that MEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEQT.TOQCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.97%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

10.56%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

13.46%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

13.21%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.05%

15.65%

-3.60%

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQT.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than QCN.TO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEQT.TO vs. QCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

MEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than QCN.TO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
1.47%1.60%1.73%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCN.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
1.95%2.19%2.74%3.37%3.26%2.45%3.03%3.07%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEQT.TO and QCN.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QCN.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for MEQT.TO.

MEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while QCN.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for MEQT.TO and 0.04% for QCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEQT.TO and QCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer