MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MEQT.TO (Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF) and EVO.TO (Evovest Global Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MEQT.TO returned 33.14% vs 10.39% for EVO.TO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEQT.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for EVO.TO.

Performance

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEQT.TO achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than EVO.TO's 9.29% return.

MEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 33.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EVO.TO

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 6M: -0.12%
• 1Y: 10.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF	13.57%	21.31%	14.24%
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF	9.29%	14.20%	6.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MEQT.TO and EVO.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.48

The correlation between MEQT.TO and EVO.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQT.TO

MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 89
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EVO.TO

EVO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 21
EVO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EVO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EVO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EVO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
EVO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEQT.TO	EVO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	0.68	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	0.94	+3.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.15	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	0.89	+3.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.64	2.56	+16.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the EVO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQT.TO and EVO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEQT.TO	EVO.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.05	0.68	+2.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.14	0.83	+1.31

Drawdowns

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, which is greater than EVO.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQT.TO and EVO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEQT.TO	EVO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.14%	-12.72%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-11.77%	+4.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.02%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-2.42%	+1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	4.06%	-2.28%

Volatility

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) is 2.93%, while Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that MEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEQT.TO	EVO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	3.29%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.02%	13.42%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	15.44%	-4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.86%	16.68%	-4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.86%	16.68%	-4.82%

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQT.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EVO.TO's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEQT.TO vs. EVO.TO - Dividend Comparison

MEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than EVO.TO's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF	0.56%	0.61%	0.78%	0.00%
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF	1.44%	1.60%	1.73%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEQT.TO and EVO.TO in my portfolio?

MEQT.TO and EVO.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MEQT.TO or EVO.TO?

On fees, MEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEQT.TO or EVO.TO?

MEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for EVO.TO.

What is the main difference between MEQT.TO and EVO.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie Investments and National Bank Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for MEQT.TO and 1.15% for EVO.TO.