PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEQFX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEQFX achieves a -4.53% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 30.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MEQFX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 10.59%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.


MEQFX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
-4.53%
6M
-13.83%
1Y
-9.02%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
10.59%

YAFFX

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.70%
YTD
30.77%
6M
14.70%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
-4.53%-2.58%24.99%19.53%-9.50%43.58%-4.00%16.01%8.16%15.35%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
30.77%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MEQFX and YAFFX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1997

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between MEQFX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEQFX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQFX
MEQFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MEQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEQFXYAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.36

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

1.71

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

6.17

-7.15

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQFX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEQFXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.32

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.58

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.62

-0.31

Drawdowns

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQFX drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQFX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEQFXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-43.80%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.43%

-17.08%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-18.88%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-21.31%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.69%

-30.62%

+1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-0.48%

-15.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.18%

-6.21%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.79%

4.70%

+4.09%

Volatility

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) is 3.34%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that MEQFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEQFXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

6.13%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

22.29%

-7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

22.19%

-5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

18.10%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

16.53%

+3.07%

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEQFX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEQFX nor YAFFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
0.00%0.00%4.48%0.98%2.13%27.90%0.00%9.17%3.40%30.28%5.96%11.63%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEQFX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to MEQFX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEQFX dropped -55.38% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

YAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEQFX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer