PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEQAX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century International Value Fund (MEQAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEQAX achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.53% return.


MEQAX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.65%
YTD
12.34%
6M
16.23%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
9.14%

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MEQAX
American Century International Value Fund
12.34%41.64%3.73%19.48%-11.64%8.39%8.93%12.14%-10.73%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MEQAX and FHLFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.94

The correlation between MEQAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEQAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQAX
MEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century International Value Fund (MEQAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEQAXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.91

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

7.17

+4.73

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQAX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEQAXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.47

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.56

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.53

-0.28

Drawdowns

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQAX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQAX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEQAXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.32%

-33.58%

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-11.37%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-13.62%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.91%

-29.36%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.42%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-6.11%

-8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.03%

-0.62%

Volatility

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century International Value Fund (MEQAX) is 3.74%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that MEQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEQAXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.64%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

12.08%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

14.83%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

15.98%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

17.64%

-0.85%

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQAX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEQAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

MEQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEQAX
American Century International Value Fund
7.01%7.87%3.66%4.28%3.72%4.95%1.11%3.27%3.31%2.80%0.43%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MEQAX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to MEQAX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEQAX dropped -60.32% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

MEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEQAX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer