MEMS vs. TJUN

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MEMS (Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - MEMS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). MEMS is actively managed, while TJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, MEMS returned 22.43% vs 9.83% for TJUN. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MEMS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.

Performance

MEMS vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMS achieves a 20.04% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 1.01% return.

MEMS

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -3.07%
• 6M: 12.20%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 1Y: 22.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.53%

TJUN

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: -1.18%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 1Y: 9.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MEMS Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF	$27.68K	$28.35K	$30.35K
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	$22.57K	$81.87K	$115.89K

MEMS vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEMS Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF	20.04%	5.25%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	1.01%	11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMS and TJUN is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.74

The correlation between MEMS and TJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MEMS vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEMS

MEMS Risk / Return Rank: 37
MEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

TJUN

TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 33
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEMS vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEMS	TJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.91	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.27	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.21	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.01	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	4.36	+0.37

MEMS vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the TJUN Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMS and TJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEMS vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMS drawdown since its inception was -22.24%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -9.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMS and TJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEMS	TJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.24%	-9.77%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-9.77%	-3.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.80%	-4.49%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-1.11%	-4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	2.26%	+2.50%

Volatility

MEMS vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) at 6.52%. This indicates that MEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEMS	TJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.18%	6.52%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.68%	9.62%	+11.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.97%	10.85%	+12.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	10.54%	+9.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	10.54%	+9.64%

MEMS vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEMS vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

MEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MEMS Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF	2.34%	2.81%	1.42%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEMS and TJUN in my portfolio?

MEMS and TJUN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEMS or TJUN?

MEMS has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to TJUN (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMS dropped -22.24% vs TJUN's -9.77%.

Which ETF is better, MEMS or TJUN?

On 1-year performance, MEMS leads with 22.43% vs 9.83% for TJUN. On fees, MEMS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEMS or TJUN?

Over the 1-year period, MEMS has performed better with a 22.43% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEMS or TJUN?

MEMS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEMS or TJUN?

MEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

What is the main difference between MEMS and TJUN?

MEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for MEMS and 0.95% for TJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.