MEM vs. DFEV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MEM (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) and DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MEM returned 21.88%/yr vs 24.39%/yr for DFEV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DFEV.

Performance

MEM vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MEM having a 24.68% return and DFEV slightly higher at 25.45%.

MEM

• 1D: -5.79%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 24.68%
• 6M: 25.39%
• 1Y: 46.10%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFEV

• 1D: -5.33%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 25.45%
• 6M: 26.35%
• 1Y: 48.75%
• 3Y*: 24.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEM vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	24.68%	28.31%	10.11%	6.92%	7.13%
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	25.45%	32.54%	7.26%	15.52%	3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MEM and DFEV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.89

The correlation between MEM and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MEM vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEM

MEM Risk / Return Rank: 65
MEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MEM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MEM Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DFEV

DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 80
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEM vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEM	DFEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.45	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.09	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.47	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	4.31	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.12	15.41	-4.29

MEM vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEM and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEM vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEM drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, roughly equal to the maximum DFEV drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEM and DFEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEM	DFEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-18.49%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.62%	-11.35%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	-17.94%	-1.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.79%	-5.33%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-4.63%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	3.17%	+0.99%

Volatility

MEM vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) at 11.67%. This indicates that MEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEM	DFEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	11.67%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.33%	18.08%	+3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.57%	20.00%	+3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.10%	17.09%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	17.09%	+2.01%

MEM vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEM vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

MEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than DFEV's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.09%	2.69%	3.17%	3.47%	3.35%
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	2.86%	3.56%	7.81%	0.01%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEM and DFEV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MEM and DFEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MEM or DFEV?

MEM has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to DFEV (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEM dropped -19.10% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

Which ETF is better, MEM or DFEV?

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 24.39% vs 21.88% for MEM. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DFEV has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEM or DFEV?

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 24.39% return vs 21.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEM or DFEV?

DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEM or DFEV?

MEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.09% for DFEV.

What is the main difference between MEM and DFEV?

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEM and 0.43% for DFEV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.