MEM vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEM (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Matthews, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. MEM is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, MEM returned 54.36% vs 3.96% for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MEM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

MEM vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEM achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.50% return.

MEM

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 8.03%
• YTD: 28.39%
• 6M: 30.14%
• 1Y: 54.36%
• 3Y*: 23.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEM vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	28.39%	28.31%	10.11%	1.23%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.50%	4.23%	5.26%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MEM and CLIP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between MEM and CLIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MEM vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEM

MEM Risk / Return Rank: 77
MEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MEM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MEM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEM vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEM	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	17.26	-14.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	72.02	-68.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	20.66	-19.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	142.22	-138.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	1,151.15	-1,137.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEM vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEM and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEM	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	17.26	-14.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	10.71	-9.57

Drawdowns

MEM vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEM drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEM and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEM	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-0.08%	-19.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.62%	-0.03%	-14.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	0.00%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-0.00%	-4.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.00%	0.00%	+4.00%

Volatility

MEM vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that MEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEM	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.97%	0.06%	+8.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.95%	0.14%	+17.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.65%	0.23%	+20.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.31%	0.44%	+17.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	0.44%	+17.87%

MEM vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEM vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

MEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than CLIP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.91%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%	0.00%
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	2.77%	3.56%	7.81%	0.01%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEM and CLIP in my portfolio?

MEM and CLIP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEM or CLIP?

MEM has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEM dropped -19.10% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, MEM or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, MEM leads with 54.36% vs 3.96% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEM or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, MEM has performed better with a 54.36% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEM or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEM or CLIP?

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.77% for MEM.

What is the main difference between MEM and CLIP?

MEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEM and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.