MELI vs. FBND
MELI (MercadoLibre, Inc.) is a stock, while FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MELI returned 28.28%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FBND. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MELI vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MELI achieves a -19.97% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MELI has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 28.28%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
MELI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -19.97%
- 6M
- -22.81%
- 1Y
- -35.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 28.28%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
MELI vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | -19.97% | 18.46% | 8.20% | 85.71% | -37.24% | -19.51% | 192.90% | 95.30% | -6.93% | 101.99% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MELI and FBND is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MELI vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
MELI
FBND
MELI vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MELI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.25 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 2.01 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 5.97 | -7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MELI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 1.41 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.12 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.41 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MELI vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MELI drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MELI and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MELI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -17.25% | -72.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.82% | -2.66% | -38.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.82% | -5.94% | -34.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.64% | -17.25% | -51.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.12% | -17.25% | -51.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.32% | -1.82% | -36.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.58% | -3.35% | -20.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.74% | 0.90% | +21.84% |
Volatility
MELI vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that MELI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MELI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 1.23% | +15.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.13% | 2.75% | +27.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.42% | 3.80% | +35.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.68% | 5.92% | +43.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.89% | 6.10% | +42.79% |
Dividends
MELI vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
MELI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.38% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MELI and FBND have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MELI has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MELI dropped -89.49% vs FBND's -17.25%.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MELI and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer