MELI vs. CFIPX

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MELI (MercadoLibre, Inc.) is a stock, while CFIPX (Franklin Global Equity Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, MELI returned 28.60%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for CFIPX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MELI vs. CFIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MELI achieves a -18.26% return, which is significantly lower than CFIPX's 8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MELI has outperformed CFIPX with an annualized return of 28.60%, while CFIPX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.

MELI

• 1D: 3.57%
• 1M: 6.44%
• YTD: -18.26%
• 6M: -16.29%
• 1Y: -30.59%
• 3Y*: 11.28%
• 5Y*: 2.90%
• 10Y*: 28.60%

CFIPX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 8.65%
• 6M: 9.11%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MELI vs. CFIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MELI MercadoLibre, Inc.	-18.26%	18.46%	8.20%	85.71%	-37.24%	-19.51%	192.90%	95.30%	-6.93%	101.99%
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund	8.65%	23.21%	24.28%	23.03%	-16.36%	24.76%	13.34%	30.63%	-12.16%	23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MELI and CFIPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2007	0.52

The correlation between MELI and CFIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MELI vs. CFIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MELI

MELI Risk / Return Rank: 12
MELI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MELI Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MELI Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MELI Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MELI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CFIPX

CFIPX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CFIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CFIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CFIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CFIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CFIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MELI vs. CFIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) and Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MELI	CFIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.77	2.02	-2.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	2.82	-3.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.36	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	3.00	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	13.57	-14.88

MELI vs. CFIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MELI Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the CFIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MELI and CFIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MELI vs. CFIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MELI drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than CFIPX's maximum drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MELI and CFIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MELI	CFIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.49%	-62.70%	-26.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.82%	-8.28%	-32.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.82%	-17.20%	-23.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.64%	-24.44%	-44.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.12%	-33.98%	-35.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.01%	-0.94%	-36.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.59%	-16.41%	-7.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.36%	1.83%	+21.53%

Volatility

MELI vs. CFIPX - Volatility Comparison

MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) at 4.50%. This indicates that MELI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MELI	CFIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.16%	4.50%	+5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.91%	9.86%	+20.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.73%	12.31%	+27.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.68%	16.20%	+33.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.91%	17.28%	+31.63%

Dividends

MELI vs. CFIPX - Dividend Comparison

MELI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund	5.90%	6.41%	3.49%	0.99%	4.99%	8.99%	0.73%	13.31%	7.86%	0.77%	1.52%	1.01%
MELI MercadoLibre, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.19%	0.38%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MELI and CFIPX in my portfolio?

MELI and CFIPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MELI or CFIPX?

MELI has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to CFIPX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MELI dropped -89.49% vs CFIPX's -62.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.