MEIIX vs. JLGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) and JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX).
MEIIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Feb 1, 1996. JLGIX is managed by JAG Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 22, 2011.
Performance
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | -0.56% | 13.26% | 11.86% | 8.21% | -6.02% | 25.43% | 3.99% | 30.04% | -9.90% | 17.20% |
JLGIX JAG Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.19% | 13.23% | 36.53% | 40.58% | -30.99% | 15.30% | 40.47% | 21.10% | 0.43% | 34.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEIIX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly higher than JLGIX's -12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MEIIX has underperformed JLGIX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while JLGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return.
MEIIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
JLGIX
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- -12.19%
- 6M
- -9.75%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEIIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MEIIX vs. JLGIX — Risk / Return Rank
MEIIX
JLGIX
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) and JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEIIX | JLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 0.93 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.58 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | 2.18 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEIIX | JLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.40 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.63 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between MEIIX and JLGIX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Dividend Comparison
MEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, less than JLGIX's 33.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEIIX MFS Value Fund Class I | 9.77% | 9.52% | 9.30% | 8.41% | 7.58% | 3.32% | 2.63% | 3.17% | 3.62% | 4.04% | 2.91% | 5.97% |
JLGIX JAG Large Cap Growth Fund | 33.45% | 29.37% | 16.00% | 9.48% | 1.57% | 19.56% | 13.06% | 8.82% | 14.57% | 15.31% | 6.07% | 4.46% |
Drawdowns
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEIIX drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than JLGIX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEIIX and JLGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEIIX | JLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.64% | -38.00% | -14.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -15.73% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.58% | -38.00% | +20.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | -38.00% | +1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -15.73% | +9.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -7.07% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 4.20% | -1.69% |
Volatility
MEIIX vs. JLGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) is 3.11%, while JAG Large Cap Growth Fund (JLGIX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that MEIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MEIIX | JLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 6.14% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 13.78% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 22.53% | -7.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 21.96% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 22.39% | -5.84% |