PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGBX vs. MDIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGBX achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than MDIJX's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MEGBX has outperformed MDIJX with an annualized return of 17.33%, while MDIJX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


MEGBX

1D
-1.27%
1M
3.08%
YTD
4.50%
6M
3.82%
1Y
14.25%
3Y*
28.40%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
17.33%

MDIJX

1D
-0.88%
1M
3.09%
YTD
9.29%
6M
10.89%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEGBX
MFS Growth Fund
4.50%11.25%61.25%34.81%-31.83%22.34%30.36%36.33%1.21%29.54%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
9.29%27.84%6.41%14.37%-17.12%7.69%15.26%26.00%-11.05%30.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGBX and MDIJX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2004

0.72

The correlation between MEGBX and MDIJX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEGBX vs. MDIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEGBX
MEGBX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MEGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIJX
MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEGBXMDIJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.92

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

7.27

-4.53

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the MDIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGBX and MDIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEGBXMDIJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.75

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.49

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.67

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.47

+0.04

Drawdowns

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGBX drawdown since its inception was -72.95%, which is greater than MDIJX's maximum drawdown of -56.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGBX and MDIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGBXMDIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.95%

-56.60%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.64%

-11.40%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-12.57%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.73%

-30.19%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.73%

-30.19%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.88%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.75%

-9.09%

-12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

3.01%

+2.47%

Volatility

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) is 3.87%, while MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that MEGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEGBXMDIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.09%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

10.21%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

12.51%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

14.23%

+9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.04%

14.70%

+7.34%

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGBX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIJX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEGBX vs. MDIJX - Dividend Comparison

MEGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.45%, more than MDIJX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
4.73%5.17%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.18%1.69%
MEGBX
MFS Growth Fund
25.45%26.60%40.46%7.21%1.51%3.91%4.94%2.13%4.95%3.26%2.03%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEGBX and MDIJX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIJX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to MEGBX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGBX dropped -72.95% vs MDIJX's -56.60%.

MDIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEGBX and MDIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer