MEGBX vs. PBCKX
MEGBX (MFS Growth Fund) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MEGBX returned 16.87%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for PBCKX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MEGBX charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.
Performance
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEGBX achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MEGBX has outperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 16.87%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.02% annualized return.
MEGBX
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.87%
PBCKX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEGBX MFS Growth Fund | 2.52% | 11.25% | 61.25% | 34.81% | -31.83% | 22.34% | 30.36% | 36.33% | 1.21% | 29.54% |
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | -1.87% | 9.20% | 26.90% | 40.58% | -30.74% | 25.05% | 34.77% | 45.22% | 2.83% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEGBX and PBCKX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MEGBX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEGBX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank
MEGBX
PBCKX
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEGBX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.00 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.09 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | -0.25 | +1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEGBX drawdown since its inception was -72.95%, which is greater than PBCKX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGBX and PBCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEGBX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.95% | -38.00% | -34.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.64% | -19.10% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -19.10% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.73% | -38.00% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.73% | -38.00% | +1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -5.59% | +2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.70% | -5.66% | -16.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 6.68% | -1.07% |
Volatility
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Growth Fund (MEGBX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) at 4.77%. This indicates that MEGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEGBX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 4.77% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | 13.16% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 15.90% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 20.48% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 20.20% | +1.90% |
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEGBX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEGBX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison
MEGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.94%, more than PBCKX's 20.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEGBX MFS Growth Fund | 25.94% | 26.60% | 40.46% | 7.21% | 1.51% | 3.91% | 4.94% | 2.13% | 4.95% | 3.26% | 2.03% | 4.61% |
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | 20.32% | 19.94% | 9.01% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 6.67% | 3.28% | 8.90% | 7.86% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEGBX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEGBX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to PBCKX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGBX dropped -72.95% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.
MEGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEGBX and PBCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer