MED vs. PSLV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MED (Medifast, Inc.) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, MED returned -7.03%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MED vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medifast, Inc. (MED) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MED achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MED has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of -7.03%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.

MED

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: -9.38%
• 3Y*: -45.75%
• 5Y*: -46.38%
• 10Y*: -7.03%

PSLV

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 6M: 23.11%
• 1Y: 102.24%
• 3Y*: 42.33%
• 5Y*: 18.65%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MED vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MED Medifast, Inc.	14.89%	-39.39%	-73.79%	-38.34%	-42.31%	9.36%	86.18%	-9.73%	82.11%	72.33%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	-0.89%	145.08%	19.43%	-1.94%	2.74%	-14.13%	42.81%	16.99%	-11.83%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MED and PSLV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010	0.07

The correlation between MED and PSLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.09 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MED : $135.04M PSLV : $14.73B
EPS MED : -$1.82 PSLV : $13.57
PS Ratio MED : 0.39 PSLV : 218.98
PB Ratio MED : 0.68 PSLV : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) MED : $346.10M PSLV : $64.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) MED : $242.70M PSLV : $404.67M
EBITDA (TTM) MED : -$3.86M PSLV : $8.21B

Return for Risk

MED vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MED

MED Risk / Return Rank: 32
MED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MED Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MED Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MED Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MED Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PSLV

PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 47
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MED vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medifast, Inc. (MED) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MED	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.76	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	1.99	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.33	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	2.53	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.44	5.58	-6.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MED vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MED Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MED and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MED	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	1.76	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-1.03	0.53	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	0.45	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.17	-0.14

Drawdowns

MED vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MED drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MED and PSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MED	PSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.40%	-79.38%	-19.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.39%	-40.65%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.91%	-40.65%	-50.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.56%	-40.65%	-55.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.76%	-42.79%	-53.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.83%	-35.53%	-60.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.81%	-58.15%	+7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.61%	18.38%	+3.23%

Volatility

MED vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Medifast, Inc. (MED) is 9.23%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that MED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MED	PSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.23%	16.60%	-7.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.06%	57.34%	-25.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.97%	58.49%	-15.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.28%	35.64%	+9.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.67%	31.14%	+16.53%

Dividends

MED vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither MED nor PSLV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MED Medifast, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.36%	5.69%	2.71%	2.30%	3.08%	1.75%	2.06%	2.57%	0.82%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MED and PSLV in my portfolio?

MED and PSLV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MED or PSLV?

PSLV has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to MED (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MED dropped -98.40% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.