PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MECVX vs. YFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MECVX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 24.04% return.


MECVX

1D
1.04%
1M
2.74%
YTD
7.56%
6M
7.35%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*

YFSNX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.20%
YTD
24.04%
6M
27.19%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MECVX
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund
7.56%13.10%10.52%29.35%-19.63%25.00%29.21%34.56%-8.92%23.08%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
24.04%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%13.00%18.32%24.48%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MECVX and YFSNX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.70

The correlation between MECVX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MECVX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MECVX
MECVX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MECVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MECVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MECVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MECVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MECVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MECVXYFSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.69

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

5.24

+2.06

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MECVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the YFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MECVX and YFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MECVX drawdown since its inception was -30.36%, smaller than the maximum YFSNX drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MECVX and YFSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MECVXYFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.36%

-35.14%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-14.09%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-14.29%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-25.26%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-3.19%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-4.93%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

4.50%

-1.96%

Volatility

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) is 4.68%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that MECVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MECVXYFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

6.52%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

21.26%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

21.73%

-8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

15.52%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

16.29%

+0.56%

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MECVX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MECVX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison

MECVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MECVX
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund
7.55%8.12%4.30%0.32%1.01%28.36%19.49%9.87%7.96%3.31%0.22%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MECVX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSNX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to MECVX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MECVX dropped -30.36% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.

MECVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MECVX and YFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer