MEAR vs. PDBC
MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEAR is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, MEAR returned 1.78%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for PDBC. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MEAR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
MEAR vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEAR achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MEAR has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 1.78%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.66%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.66M | $11.13M | $9.34M | |
| $121.86M | $152.61M | $122.20M |
MEAR vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.31% | 3.76% | 3.40% | 3.93% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 1.18% | 1.91% | 1.63% | 1.12% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.15% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEAR and PDBC is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2015 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MEAR and PDBC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEAR vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
MEAR
PDBC
MEAR vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEAR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.31 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 2.16 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.25 | 7.07 | +14.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEAR vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEAR drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEAR and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEAR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -49.52% | +46.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.47% | -16.55% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.86% | -16.55% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.10% | -27.63% | +26.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.68% | -40.73% | +38.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.21% | +10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -23.02% | +22.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.12% | 5.05% | -4.93% |
Volatility
MEAR vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) is 0.28%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that MEAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEAR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 7.58% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 16.65% | -16.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86% | 19.73% | -18.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.99% | 19.28% | -18.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.51% | 17.85% | -16.34% |
MEAR vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEAR vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
MEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than PDBC's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.83% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.00% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEAR and PDBC have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to MEAR (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEAR dropped -2.68% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 10-year performance, PDBC leads with 8.61% vs 1.78% for MEAR. On fees, MEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 8.61% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.83% for MEAR.
MEAR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MEAR and 0.58% for PDBC.
MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEAR and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer