MDYG vs. SFYX
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX).
MDYG and SFYX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. SFYX is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2019. Both MDYG and SFYX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MDYG vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDYG vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 5.12% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 7.18% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 14.25% | 14.45% | 17.70% | -22.88% | 18.89% | 17.63% | 6.95% |
Returns By Period
MDYG
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 22.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDYG vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MDYG vs. SFYX — Risk / Return Rank
MDYG
SFYX
MDYG vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and SFYX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDYG vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than SFYX's 1.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. SFYX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.69% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.08% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | — | — |
Volatility
MDYG vs. SFYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDYG | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.21% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | — | — |