PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDSIX vs. DFIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) and DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDSIX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than DFIGX's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MDSIX has outperformed DFIGX with an annualized return of 1.97%, while DFIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.82% annualized return.


MDSIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.68%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
1.97%

DFIGX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
0.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDSIX
Integrity Short Term Government Fund
1.54%6.91%6.90%4.30%-7.23%-1.14%2.76%3.54%2.21%1.19%
DFIGX
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio
-0.02%6.33%0.47%4.58%-13.12%-3.14%9.10%7.22%0.92%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MDSIX and DFIGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011

0.65

The correlation between MDSIX and DFIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDSIX vs. DFIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDSIX
MDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIGX
DFIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DFIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) and DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDSIXDFIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.16

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

1.16

+3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.09

3.36

+15.73

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the DFIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDSIX and DFIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDSIXDFIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

0.90

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

-0.10

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.15

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.99

-0.38

Drawdowns

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDSIX drawdown since its inception was -11.28%, smaller than the maximum DFIGX drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDSIX and DFIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDSIXDFIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-19.56%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-3.08%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.60%

-5.47%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.08%

-17.62%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.28%

-19.56%

+8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-7.39%

+7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-3.12%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.05%

-0.75%

Volatility

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) is 1.04%, while DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that MDSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDSIXDFIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.27%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

2.67%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

3.94%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

6.23%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.16%

5.35%

-2.19%

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDSIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIGX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDSIX vs. DFIGX - Dividend Comparison

MDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than DFIGX's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIGX
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio
2.30%2.22%2.82%2.33%1.78%2.36%4.14%2.16%2.19%1.57%1.66%2.49%
MDSIX
Integrity Short Term Government Fund
3.28%2.54%3.91%1.51%0.93%1.90%4.41%3.50%3.70%3.01%2.50%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDSIX and DFIGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIGX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to MDSIX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDSIX dropped -11.28% vs DFIGX's -19.56%.

MDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDSIX and DFIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer