PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLV vs. DIVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLV achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.90% return.


MDLV

1D
0.67%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.88%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*

DIVZ

1D
0.78%
1M
0.45%
YTD
3.90%
6M
4.40%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.95%13.30%10.16%0.68%
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
3.90%16.72%18.44%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLV and DIVZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.83

The correlation between MDLV and DIVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDLV
DIVZ

Utilities

15.2%
17.2%

Industrials

15.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

14.9%
8.7%

Energy

14.4%
19.4%

Technology

9.3%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
20.0%

Healthcare

7.9%
16.0%

Communication Services

6.4%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
6.6%

Basic Materials

2.6%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Utilities

MDLV
15.2%
DIVZ
17.2%

Industrials

MDLV
15.0%
DIVZ
4.6%

Financial Services

MDLV
14.9%
DIVZ
8.7%

Energy

MDLV
14.4%
DIVZ
19.4%

Technology

MDLV
9.3%
DIVZ
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

MDLV
8.2%
DIVZ
20.0%

Healthcare

MDLV
7.9%
DIVZ
16.0%

Communication Services

MDLV
6.4%
DIVZ
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MDLV
3.9%
DIVZ
6.6%

Basic Materials

MDLV
2.6%
DIVZ
5.7%

Real Estate

MDLV
2.2%
DIVZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVZ
DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDLVDIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.23

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.10

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

5.18

+10.57

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLV and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDLVDIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.32

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.90

+0.18

Drawdowns

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLV drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum DIVZ drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLV and DIVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLVDIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-15.42%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-5.83%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-9.52%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-3.76%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-3.49%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

2.36%

-1.00%

Volatility

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) is 2.83%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that MDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLVDIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.41%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

7.05%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

9.31%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

12.65%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

12.57%

-2.06%

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

MDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DIVZ's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
2.58%2.60%2.63%3.66%3.23%3.83%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.78%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to MDLV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLV dropped -10.71% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

On 3-year performance, DIVZ leads with 15.48% vs 13.07% for MDLV. On fees, MDLV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DIVZ has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDLV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.58% for DIVZ.

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Dempsey and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MDLV and 0.65% for DIVZ.

MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLV and DIVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer