PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIZX vs. MINIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIZX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's 7.26% return.


MDIZX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.30%
6M
12.32%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

MINIX

1D
0.63%
1M
3.72%
YTD
7.26%
6M
9.26%
1Y
21.11%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
10.30%27.99%6.52%14.48%-17.04%7.79%15.45%26.09%-10.93%3.71%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
7.26%33.06%7.35%18.04%-23.05%10.55%20.45%25.90%-9.02%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIZX and MINIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.95

The correlation between MDIZX and MINIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIZX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIZX
MDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MINIX
MINIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MINIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MINIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIZXMINIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.65

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

5.95

+1.56

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MINIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIZX and MINIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIZXMINIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.48

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.49

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.57

+0.01

Drawdowns

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIZX drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, smaller than the maximum MINIX drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIZX and MINIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIZXMINIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-51.72%

+21.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-12.42%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-13.59%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-36.78%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.31%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-8.61%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.43%

-0.43%

Volatility

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) have volatilities of 3.98% and 4.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIZXMINIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.06%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

10.98%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

13.87%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

16.62%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

15.62%

-0.42%

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIZX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison

MDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than MINIX's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
4.77%5.26%3.61%4.24%2.76%2.79%1.72%2.57%3.23%1.66%0.00%0.00%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
7.24%7.77%12.02%11.21%13.90%7.25%5.25%3.94%4.49%2.62%1.82%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MDIZX and MINIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MINIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to MDIZX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIZX dropped -30.09% vs MINIX's -51.72%.

MDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIZX and MINIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer