PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIDX vs. TBGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDIDX having a 10.14% return and TBGVX slightly lower at 10.01%. Over the past 10 years, MDIDX has outperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


MDIDX

1D
0.63%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.14%
6M
12.13%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
9.63%

TBGVX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.41%
YTD
10.01%
6M
11.76%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIDX
MFS International Diversification Fund Class A
10.14%27.58%6.12%14.05%-17.31%7.42%14.99%25.68%-11.25%29.94%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
10.01%23.86%2.47%12.48%-7.52%15.62%-1.00%14.64%-6.72%15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIDX and TBGVX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2004

0.79

The correlation between MDIDX and TBGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIDX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIDX
MDIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MDIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TBGVX
TBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIDXTBGVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.96

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

2.77

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.97

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.32

6.35

+0.98

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the TBGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIDX and TBGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIDXTBGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.96

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.63

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.75

-0.29

Drawdowns

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIDX drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, which is greater than TBGVX's maximum drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIDX and TBGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIDXTBGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-50.97%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-9.56%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.60%

-11.45%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-17.71%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-31.18%

+0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.59%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-6.08%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.96%

+0.05%

Volatility

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 2.73%. This indicates that MDIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIDXTBGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

2.73%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

7.78%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

9.61%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

11.11%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

12.67%

+2.04%

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIDX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIDX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison

MDIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than TBGVX's 11.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIDX
MFS International Diversification Fund Class A
4.53%4.99%3.27%3.94%2.41%2.47%1.45%2.30%2.89%1.42%1.94%1.60%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
11.01%12.11%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.10%3.16%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIDX and TBGVX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIDX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to TBGVX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIDX dropped -56.80% vs TBGVX's -50.97%.

TBGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIDX and TBGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer