PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIDX vs. FSOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) and Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDIDX having a 9.89% return and FSOSX slightly lower at 9.78%.


MDIDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.83%
YTD
9.89%
6M
9.65%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
10.14%

FSOSX

1D
0.61%
1M
5.33%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.27%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MDIDX
MFS International Diversification Fund Class A
9.89%27.58%6.12%14.05%-17.31%7.42%14.99%8.33%
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
9.78%21.29%5.87%21.49%-23.25%19.59%16.36%7.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIDX and FSOSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.93

The correlation between MDIDX and FSOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIDX vs. FSOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIDX
MDIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOSX
FSOSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) and Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDIDXFSOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.17

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.25

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

4.43

+3.12

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the FSOSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIDX and FSOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIDX drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, which is greater than FSOSX's maximum drawdown of -35.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIDX and FSOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIDXFSOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-35.36%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-12.39%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.60%

-14.07%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-35.36%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-7.74%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.49%

-0.46%

Volatility

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) is 4.87%, while Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that MDIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIDXFSOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

6.30%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

15.32%

-4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

17.64%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

17.85%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

19.10%

-4.39%

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIDX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIDX vs. FSOSX - Dividend Comparison

MDIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than FSOSX's 8.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
8.33%9.15%2.25%1.63%1.80%2.92%1.12%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDIDX
MFS International Diversification Fund Class A
4.54%4.99%3.27%3.94%2.41%2.47%1.45%2.30%2.89%1.42%1.94%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIDX and FSOSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSOSX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to MDIDX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIDX dropped -56.80% vs FSOSX's -35.36%.

MDIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIDX and FSOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer