MDEV vs. FTXL
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDEV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDEV returned -2.86%/yr vs 61.52%/yr for FTXL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
MDEV vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
MDEV vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and FTXL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MDEV and FTXL has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MDEV vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
FTXL
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Energy
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
FTXL
Real Estate
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Technology
MDEV
-
FTXL
Utilities
MDEV
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
FTXL
MDEV vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDEV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.78 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 15.62 | -16.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 58.28 | -59.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDEV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 6.33 | -6.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.94 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -43.87% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -14.51% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | -41.57% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.76% | 0.00% | -33.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -10.56% | -15.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 3.88% | +3.34% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) is 4.60%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that MDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 14.28% | -9.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 28.98% | -17.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 35.94% | -19.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 36.02% | -17.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 34.25% | -15.27% |
MDEV vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and FTXL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to MDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 3-year performance, FTXL leads with 61.52% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, MDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 61.52% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
MDEV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer