MDEV vs. AGNG
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and AGNG (Global X Aging Population ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index while AGNG tracks the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDEV returned -2.86%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for AGNG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AGNG.
Performance
MDEV vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than AGNG's -4.79% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGNG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
MDEV vs. AGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | -4.79% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | -5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and AGNG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MDEV and AGNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDEV vs. AGNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
AGNG
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
AGNG
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Energy
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Real Estate
MDEV
-
AGNG
Technology
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Utilities
MDEV
-
AGNG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. AGNG — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
AGNG
MDEV vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDEV | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.13 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.86 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 2.34 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDEV | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.72 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.53 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than AGNG's maximum drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and AGNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -30.58% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -11.45% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | -14.48% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.76% | -11.09% | -22.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -5.95% | -19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 4.20% | +3.02% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) at 3.87%. This indicates that MDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 3.87% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 10.00% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 13.62% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 15.22% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 17.13% | +1.85% |
MDEV vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.92% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and AGNG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDEV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to AGNG (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs AGNG's -30.58%.
On 3-year performance, AGNG leads with 8.25% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGNG has performed better with a 8.25% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.50% for AGNG.
AGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and AGNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer