PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDDAX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDDAX achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MDDAX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 11.93%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.15% annualized return.


MDDAX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.75%
YTD
9.86%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.93%

HFCVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDDAX
MassMutual Diversified Value Fund
9.86%16.56%16.62%8.97%-2.70%28.07%-1.14%32.34%-8.88%15.88%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.70%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MDDAX and HFCVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2004

0.92

The correlation between MDDAX and HFCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDDAX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDDAX
MDDAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MDDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MDDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDDAXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.91

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

4.22

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

7.07

-3.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.27

21.66

-8.39

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDDAX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDDAXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.91

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.89

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.68

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDDAX drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDDAX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDDAXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-65.75%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-3.77%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-11.32%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

-16.81%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.72%

-39.39%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-8.24%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.23%

+0.73%

Volatility

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Diversified Value Fund (MDDAX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDDAXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.79%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

6.85%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

9.16%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

13.26%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

16.46%

+2.26%

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDDAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDDAX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

MDDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.53%, more than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.50%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%
MDDAX
MassMutual Diversified Value Fund
29.53%32.44%40.33%4.62%12.85%12.66%1.64%11.68%18.94%37.06%5.94%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDDAX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDDAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDDAX dropped -63.45% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDDAX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer