MDBX vs. SMU
MDBX (Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF) and SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
MDBX vs. SMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MDBX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMU
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -57.47%
- 6M
- -84.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDBX vs. SMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDBX Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF | -74.57% | 207.63% |
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | -57.47% | -88.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBX and SMU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDBX vs. SMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF (MDBX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDBX | SMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.48 | — |
Drawdowns
MDBX vs. SMU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBX | SMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -98.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -98.20% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -75.98% | — |
Volatility
MDBX vs. SMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDBX | SMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 203.70% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 203.70% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 203.70% | — |
MDBX vs. SMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MDBX and SMU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
MDBX vs. SMU - Dividend Comparison
Neither MDBX nor SMU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MDBX and SMU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDBX and SMU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
MDBX and SMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for MDBX and SMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer