MDBX vs. LULG
MDBX (Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
MDBX vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MDBX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG
- 1D
- 7.44%
- 1M
- -24.05%
- YTD
- -75.09%
- 6M
- -75.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDBX vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDBX Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF | -74.57% | 30.93% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -75.09% | 55.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBX and LULG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDBX vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long MDB Daily ETF (MDBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDBX vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBX | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -79.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -76.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -36.96% | — |
Volatility
MDBX vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDBX | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 88.55% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 88.55% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 88.55% | — |
MDBX vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDBX vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
Neither MDBX nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MDBX and LULG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MDBX.
MDBX and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MDBX and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for MDBX and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer