MDBU.L vs. UB82.L
MDBU.L (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UB82.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Government Bonds funds from UBS - MDBU.L tracks the Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index while UB82.L tracks the Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDBU.L returned 2.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for UB82.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDBU.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for UB82.L.
Performance
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDBU.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than UB82.L's 0.06% return.
MDBU.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 1.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
UB82.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBU.L UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.13% | -0.80% | 4.66% | -1.28% | 3.51% | -0.35% | 1.30% | 1.13% | 0.00% |
UB82.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.48% | -3.11% | -6.16% | -0.72% | 4.31% | 7.61% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBU.L and UB82.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2018 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, MDBU.L and UB82.L have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L — Risk / Return Rank
MDBU.L
UB82.L
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDBU.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.98 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | 2.38 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDBU.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.72 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.01 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDBU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, smaller than the maximum UB82.L drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBU.L and UB82.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBU.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.04% | -23.85% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | -4.86% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.99% | -7.79% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.15% | -16.39% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.05% | -19.18% | +10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -16.84% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.15% | -0.22% |
Volatility
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) at 1.49%. This indicates that MDBU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB82.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDBU.L | UB82.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.49% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 4.44% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.06% | 6.57% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 12.53% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 15.99% | -6.76% |
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDBU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than UB82.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDBU.L vs. UB82.L - Dividend Comparison
MDBU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than UB82.L's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBU.L UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 3.14% | 3.96% | 2.14% | 1.92% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 1.73% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
UB82.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 3.10% | 2.20% | 2.52% | 2.82% | 1.33% | 0.99% | 1.81% | 1.93% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDBU.L and UB82.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB82.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB82.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.L.
MDBU.L tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index, while UB82.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MDBU.L and 0.05% for UB82.L.
Find the right allocation for MDBU.L and UB82.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer