MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE
MDBA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and UIMA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - MDBA.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while UIMA.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDBA.DE returned 1.90%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for UIMA.DE. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. MDBA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for UIMA.DE.
Performance
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDBA.DE achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than UIMA.DE's 7.64% return.
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
UIMA.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.20% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -4.47% | 7.64% | 0.37% |
UIMA.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.64% | 20.65% | 8.36% | 15.54% | -9.27% | 24.93% | -3.30% | 27.60% | -7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDBA.DE and UIMA.DE is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018 | -0.16 |
The correlation between MDBA.DE and UIMA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (5 years) to -0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MDBA.DE
UIMA.DE
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDBA.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.75 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 6.51 | -5.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDBA.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 1.29 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.70 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum UIMA.DE drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDBA.DE and UIMA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDBA.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -35.78% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -9.42% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.11% | -16.25% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | -19.42% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -1.50% | -4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -5.66% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 2.53% | -0.98% |
Volatility
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) is 0.85%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that MDBA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIMA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDBA.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 4.30% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | 10.54% | -6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 12.75% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 14.19% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 15.57% | -8.54% |
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDBA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than UIMA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDBA.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Dividend Comparison
MDBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UIMA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMA.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 3.16% | 2.48% | 2.67% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 2.02% | 2.06% | 2.87% | 3.38% | 2.91% | 3.95% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDBA.DE and UIMA.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIMA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.
MDBA.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while UIMA.DE is Europe Equities. MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped, while UIMA.DE tracks MSCI Europe. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDBA.DE and 0.10% for UIMA.DE.
Find the right allocation for MDBA.DE and UIMA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer