MDAA vs. YYY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) and YYY (Amplify CEF High Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MDAA is actively managed, while YYY is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDAA charges 0.97%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for YYY.

Performance

MDAA vs. YYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than YYY's 3.82% return.

MDAA

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 8.24%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 6M: 22.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YYY

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 3.82%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 11.25%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: 5.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDAA vs. YYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	22.13%	-0.27%
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF	3.82%	0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MDAA and YYY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

MDAA vs. YYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YYY

YYY Risk / Return Rank: 35
YYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
YYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
YYY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
YYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
YYY Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDAA vs. YYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDAA	YYY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.43	+1.04

Drawdowns

MDAA vs. YYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum YYY drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and YYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDAA	YYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-42.52%	+27.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.07%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-1.90%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-6.84%	+3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MDAA	YYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	8.56%	+15.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	11.36%	+12.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.89%	13.90%	+9.99%

MDAA vs. YYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YYY's 3.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDAA vs. YYY - Dividend Comparison

MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than YYY's 12.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF	12.70%	12.51%	12.50%	12.39%	12.36%	9.08%	9.79%	9.10%	9.73%	8.16%	10.34%	10.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDAA and YYY in my portfolio?

MDAA and YYY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MDAA or YYY?

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDAA or YYY?

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDAA or YYY?

YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.70%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between MDAA and YYY?

They also come from different issuers: Myriad and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MDAA and 3.23% for YYY.