PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSTX vs. MITTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSTX achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly higher than MITTX's 8.10% return.


MCSTX

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
24.65%
6M
25.11%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*

MITTX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.36%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.84%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCSTX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4
24.65%18.51%5.09%-6.15%13.37%27.60%-0.21%-1.04%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
8.10%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%15.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSTX and MITTX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.20

The correlation between MCSTX and MITTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSTX vs. MITTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSTX
MCSTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MCSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCSTXMITTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

1.89

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.62

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.34

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

2.17

+2.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.83

9.43

+6.40

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the MITTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSTX and MITTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCSTXMITTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.89

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.66

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.43

-0.08

Drawdowns

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSTX drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum MITTX drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSTX and MITTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSTXMITTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-49.54%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-9.76%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-16.10%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.67%

-23.27%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

0.00%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.49%

-10.54%

-6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.24%

+0.28%

Volatility

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) at 2.44%. This indicates that MCSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MITTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSTXMITTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

2.44%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

8.56%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

11.21%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.70%

15.68%

+19.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.00%

17.21%

+12.79%

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSTX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MITTX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSTX vs. MITTX - Dividend Comparison

MCSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, less than MITTX's 13.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSTX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4
12.90%16.08%3.30%2.21%27.44%56.14%0.87%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
13.25%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSTX and MITTX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCSTX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to MITTX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSTX dropped -37.67% vs MITTX's -49.54%.

MCSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSTX and MITTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer