PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSTX vs. FIFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSTX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than FIFGX's 31.86% return.


MCSTX

1D
-0.95%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
15.24%
6M
13.97%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*

FIFGX

1D
-0.82%
1M
-10.27%
YTD
31.86%
6M
27.90%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
143.41%
5Y*
73.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCSTX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4
15.24%18.51%5.09%-6.15%13.37%27.60%-0.21%-1.04%
FIFGX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused
31.86%7.44%6.34%781.04%9.30%32.92%1.48%0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSTX and FIFGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019

0.89

The correlation between MCSTX and FIFGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSTX vs. FIFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSTX
MCSTX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MCSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FIFGX
FIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSTXFIFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.05

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

8.28

+0.28

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FIFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSTX and FIFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSTX drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than FIFGX's maximum drawdown of -29.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSTX and FIFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSTXFIFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-29.47%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-13.63%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.34%

-13.63%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.67%

-29.47%

-8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-13.63%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-7.68%

-9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

4.16%

-1.25%

Volatility

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) is 3.30%, while Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that MCSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSTXFIFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.75%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

18.63%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

21.64%

-5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.67%

406.31%

-371.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.91%

331.72%

-301.81%

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSTX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FIFGX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSTX vs. FIFGX - Dividend Comparison

MCSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.95%, more than FIFGX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FIFGX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused
4.13%5.44%4.73%1.54%12.64%35.77%3.10%1.59%
MCSTX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4
13.95%16.08%3.30%2.21%27.44%56.14%0.87%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSTX and FIFGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIFGX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to MCSTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSTX dropped -37.67% vs FIFGX's -29.47%.

MCSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSTX and FIFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer