PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSIX vs. VCMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSIX achieves a 24.31% return, which is significantly higher than VCMDX's 22.41% return.


MCSIX

1D
1.12%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
24.31%
6M
25.37%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
7.37%

VCMDX

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
22.41%
6M
22.98%
1Y
35.08%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
24.31%18.47%5.08%-6.13%13.40%27.55%-0.02%1.36%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
22.41%18.20%5.27%-7.45%13.83%34.82%5.07%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSIX and VCMDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between MCSIX and VCMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSIX vs. VCMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSIX
MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VCMDX
VCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCSIXVCMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

2.54

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

3.21

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

5.05

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.54

15.51

+1.03

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the VCMDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSIX and VCMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCSIXVCMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.54

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.75

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.85

-0.73

Drawdowns

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSIX drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, which is greater than VCMDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSIX and VCMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSIXVCMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-26.67%

-37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-7.25%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.74%

-9.90%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.61%

-25.45%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-3.78%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-10.87%

-22.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.36%

+0.14%

Volatility

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) have volatilities of 4.84% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSIXVCMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

5.02%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

12.72%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

14.93%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.65%

15.86%

+18.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

15.39%

+10.64%

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than VCMDX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSIX vs. VCMDX - Dividend Comparison

MCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than VCMDX's 12.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSIX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
12.90%16.04%3.30%2.21%27.42%56.01%0.88%1.87%3.50%3.14%0.61%0.47%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
12.42%15.21%2.19%2.50%14.21%30.56%0.50%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, MCSIX and VCMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCMDX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to MCSIX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSIX dropped -64.20% vs VCMDX's -26.67%.

MCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSIX and VCMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer