PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSFX vs. ODMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) and Invesco Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MCSFX having a 24.44% return and ODMAX slightly lower at 23.78%.


MCSFX

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
24.44%
6M
24.59%
1Y
38.29%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*

ODMAX

1D
1.76%
1M
11.47%
YTD
23.78%
6M
26.12%
1Y
48.63%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCSFX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
24.44%17.09%4.32%-7.25%12.27%26.40%-1.34%-1.69%
ODMAX
Invesco Developing Markets Fund
23.78%28.34%-1.39%11.17%-25.16%-7.54%17.22%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSFX and ODMAX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.29

The correlation between MCSFX and ODMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSFX vs. ODMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSFX
MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ODMAX
ODMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ODMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ODMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ODMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ODMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ODMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) and Invesco Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCSFXODMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.54

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

4.04

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

16.04

-1.05

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the ODMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSFX and ODMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCSFXODMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.92

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.13

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.54

-0.21

Drawdowns

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSFX drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum ODMAX drawdown of -61.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSFX and ODMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSFXODMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-61.63%

+24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

-12.08%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.60%

-18.26%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

-45.07%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

0.00%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-14.59%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.03%

-0.44%

Volatility

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) is 4.74%, while Invesco Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that MCSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ODMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSFXODMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

6.64%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

13.78%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

16.72%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.15%

17.81%

+16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

17.88%

+11.69%

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSFX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ODMAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSFX vs. ODMAX - Dividend Comparison

MCSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.09%, less than ODMAX's 33.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSFX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
12.09%15.05%2.25%1.04%26.24%54.80%0.15%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ODMAX
Invesco Developing Markets Fund
33.57%41.55%0.01%0.53%0.57%5.01%0.00%2.12%0.28%0.30%0.23%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSFX and ODMAX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ODMAX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to MCSFX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSFX dropped -37.16% vs ODMAX's -61.63%.

ODMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSFX and ODMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer