MCSFX vs. MINIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX).
MCSFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Aug 15, 2018. MINIX is managed by MFS.
Performance
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.28% | 17.09% | 4.32% | -7.25% | 12.27% | 26.40% | -1.34% | -1.69% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | -3.26% | 33.06% | 7.35% | 18.04% | -23.05% | 10.55% | 20.45% | 11.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSFX achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's -3.26% return.
MCSFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 6M
- 26.86%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- —
MINIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSFX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCSFX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCSFX
MINIX
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCSFX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.12 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.52 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.33 | +1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 5.28 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCSFX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.12 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSFX and MINIX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison
MCSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, more than MINIX's 8.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.51% | 15.05% | 2.25% | 1.04% | 26.24% | 54.80% | 0.15% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 8.03% | 7.77% | 12.02% | 11.21% | 13.90% | 7.25% | 5.25% | 3.94% | 4.49% | 2.62% | 1.82% | 3.20% |
Drawdowns
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSFX drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum MINIX drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSFX and MINIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSFX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.16% | -51.72% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -12.42% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.16% | -36.78% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -11.89% | +10.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -8.64% | -10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.13% | +0.15% |
Volatility
MCSFX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) at 5.98%. This indicates that MCSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCSFX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 5.98% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 10.11% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 15.74% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.14% | 16.45% | +17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 15.52% | +14.33% |