MCOW vs. RSHO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MCOW (Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MCOW is passively managed, while RSHO is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCOW charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.

Performance

MCOW vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCOW achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 29.68% return.

MCOW

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSHO

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 29.68%
• 6M: 28.91%
• 1Y: 52.45%
• 3Y*: 29.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCOW vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MCOW Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	5.86%	-3.62%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	29.68%	4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MCOW and RSHO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

MCOW vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSHO

RSHO Risk / Return Rank: 70
RSHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RSHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RSHO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RSHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RSHO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCOW vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCOW	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	1.41	-1.26

Drawdowns

MCOW vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCOW drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCOW and RSHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCOW	RSHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.02%	-27.31%	+12.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-3.30%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-4.32%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MCOW	RSHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.89%	23.98%	-6.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.89%	22.61%	-4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.89%	22.61%	-4.72%

MCOW vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCOW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCOW vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

MCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than RSHO's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MCOW Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	0.22%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCOW and RSHO in my portfolio?

MCOW and RSHO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MCOW or RSHO?

On fees, MCOW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MCOW or RSHO?

MCOW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MCOW or RSHO?

MCOW and RSHO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.22%.

What is the main difference between MCOW and RSHO?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MCOW and 0.75% for RSHO.