PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCO vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCO vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moody's Corporation (MCO) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCO achieves a -11.83% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MCO has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 17.48%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.


MCO

1D
-1.15%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-11.83%
6M
-8.45%
1Y
-6.21%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
17.48%

PDBC

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
36.23%
6M
36.27%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCO vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCO
Moody's Corporation
-11.83%8.74%22.17%41.52%-27.80%35.57%23.26%71.26%-4.10%58.53%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
36.23%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MCO and PDBC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.14

The correlation between MCO and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCO vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCO
MCO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCO vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moody's Corporation (MCO) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCOPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.43

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

6.35

-6.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

13.39

-13.97

MCO vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCO and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCOPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

2.46

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.65

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.23

+0.25

Drawdowns

MCO vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCO drawdown since its inception was -78.72%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCO and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCOPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.72%

-49.52%

-29.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.61%

-7.19%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.65%

-13.95%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.66%

-27.63%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-40.73%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.53%

-4.55%

-11.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-23.21%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.64%

3.41%

+7.23%

Volatility

MCO vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

Moody's Corporation (MCO) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.20%. This indicates that MCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCOPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

6.20%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.91%

15.78%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.23%

18.61%

+7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.31%

19.12%

+7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.84%

17.78%

+10.06%

Dividends

MCO vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

MCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than PDBC's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCO
Moody's Corporation
0.88%0.74%0.72%0.79%1.26%0.63%0.77%0.84%1.26%1.03%1.57%1.36%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.82%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCO and PDBC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCO has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to PDBC (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCO dropped -78.72% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCO and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer