GCPYX vs. LGRCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GCPYX (Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund) and LGRCX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C) are both mutual funds - GCPYX is a Options Trading fund managed by Natixis, while LGRCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, GCPYX returned 9.35%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for LGRCX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GCPYX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for LGRCX.

Performance

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCPYX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than LGRCX's -6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GCPYX has underperformed LGRCX with an annualized return of 9.35%, while LGRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.

GCPYX

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: 4.75%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 13.15%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 9.35%
• ALL TIME*: 8.60%

LGRCX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -2.51%
• 6M: -6.34%
• YTD: -6.93%
• 1Y: -2.63%
• 3Y*: 13.61%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 13.95%
• ALL TIME*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GCPYX Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCPYX Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund	5.97%	12.59%	18.15%	17.59%	-11.48%	19.28%	8.38%	16.67%	-5.37%	12.22%
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	-6.93%	12.90%	33.77%	49.68%	-28.62%	17.50%	30.41%	30.47%	-3.53%	31.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GCPYX and LGRCX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.89

The correlation between GCPYX and LGRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCPYX vs. LGRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCPYX

GCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 80
GCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
GCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
GCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LGRCX

LGRCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LGRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LGRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LGRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LGRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LGRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCPYX	LGRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	-0.18	+1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	-0.13	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.98	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	-0.18	+2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.53	-0.46	+12.99

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the LGRCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCPYX and LGRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCPYX drawdown since its inception was -25.24%, smaller than the maximum LGRCX drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCPYX and LGRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCPYX	LGRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.24%	-58.53%	+33.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.02%	-18.16%	+11.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.49%	-28.96%	+13.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.33%	-35.31%	+16.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.24%	-35.31%	+10.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-10.17%	+8.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-11.08%	+8.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	6.61%	-5.32%

Volatility

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) is 2.63%, while Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that GCPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCPYX	LGRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	5.36%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.48%	13.84%	-6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.59%	18.14%	-8.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.38%	23.34%	-10.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.49%	21.22%	-8.73%

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCPYX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LGRCX's 1.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCPYX vs. LGRCX - Dividend Comparison

GCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than LGRCX's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCPYX Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund	0.40%	0.44%	0.73%	0.92%	0.96%	0.47%	0.82%	1.07%	1.12%	1.03%	1.15%	1.47%
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	3.33%	3.10%	7.70%	8.01%	21.28%	5.81%	5.14%	2.60%	6.05%	2.18%	1.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCPYX and LGRCX in my portfolio?

GCPYX and LGRCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCPYX or LGRCX?

LGRCX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to GCPYX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCPYX dropped -25.24% vs LGRCX's -58.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.